Predictions
Matches
Calendar
H2H
Rankings
Picks Blog
Camila Giorgi vs Coco Vandeweghe Prediction, Head-to-Head, Odds & Pick - Matchstat.com
By Wojtek Kolan
At Matchstat.com we give you unbeatable in-depth analysis of past and current event tennis stats, to give you accurate tennis predictions, picks, odds and value bets. Let's dive in with our Giorgi vs Vandeweghe analysis and find out who is favored!
Camila Giorgi vs Coco Vandeweghe Important H2H Prediction Stats:
Head-to-head: Giorgi 2 - 1 Vandeweghe
- Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Giorgi has won 42.41% of points on their second serve, while Vandeweghe has won 0%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
- Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Giorgi, in recent form, has won 55.65% of their opponent's second serve points, while Vandeweghe has won 0%. The same stats for first serve returns are 23.42% and 0% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
- Under pressure analysis: Giorgi has saved 58.23% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Vandeweghe has saved 0% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
- Performance overview: Over the last year Giorgi has won 46.15% of matches played (W/L 12/ 14), with Vandeweghe winning 37.5% (W/L 3/ 5) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
- Best surface: Giorgi has their best career surface win % on Grass, winning 62% (W/L 58/ 35), and worse career win % on Hard, winning 55% (W/L 177/ 142). Vandeweghe has their best career surface win % on Grass, winning 67% (W/L 70/ 34), and worse career win % on Clay, winning 45% (W/L 42/ 52).
- Player level: In the last year, Giorgi has played most of their matches on the Masters series, winning 58.33% of matches (W/L 7/ 5), where as Vandeweghe has played most of their matches on the Grand Slam, winning 50% of matches (W/L 2/ 2). When comparing stats between players to predict the favorite, it is of course all relative to the event level they have been playing at.
- Direct H2H matches: They have played 3 times before with Giorgi winning 2 times and Vandeweghe being victorious 1 times. They have played 7 sets in total, with Giorgi winning 4 and Vandeweghe winning 3. The last match between Giorgi and Vandeweghe was at the New Haven Open at Yale - New Haven, 17-08-2014, First, Hard with Camila Giorgi getting the victory 6-3 6-1.
- Head to head match duration: In past head to head matches, the average match time between these players has been 0:20:54.
- Deciding set H2H prediction: Giorgi and Vandeweghe have played a deciding set 1 times, with Giorgi winning 1 times and Vandeweghe 0 times. Very useful for predicting the outcome if this match goes the distance.
- Head-to-Head extreme pressure situations: They have played 1 tiebreaks against each other with Giorgi winning 1, and Vandeweghe 0.
- Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Giorgi has played against opponents with an average rank of 137.46 while Vandeweghe has played against players with an average rank of 365.88.
- Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Giorgi has won 29% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Vandeweghe has won 100% in all matches played on tour.
- Break point conversion: In recent form, Giorgi has converted 42.86% of breakpoint opportunities, and Vandeweghe has converted 0% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
116
Rank
26
High
32
Age
R
Plays
2
Total1
2
Hard0
0
Clay0
0
Indoor0
0
Grass1
713
Rank
9
High
32
Age
R
Plays
L
W
L
L
L
L
W
L
W
L
Form
L
L
L
L
W
W
W
L
L
L
57% (392-294)
Career Total W/L
52% (308-281)
33% (3-6)
YTD W/L
0% (0-0)
$4,574,664
Career Prize Money
$4,045,196
0
YTD Titles
0
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
Giorgi VS Vandeweghe H2H Stats Used In Our Predictions
| stats | Camila Giorgi | Coco Vandeweghe |
|---|---|---|
| All H2H Matches | 2 | 1 |
| Sets Won | 4 | 3 |
| Games Won | 38 | 31 |
| Aces (Total) | 4 | 7 |
| DFs (Total) | 6 | 6 |
| Avg Match Time | 0:20:54 | 0:20:54 |
| 1st Serve % | 39% (16/41) | 48% (26/54) |
| 1st Serve Win% | 88% (14/16) | 54% (14/26) |
| 2nd Serve Win% | 56% (14/25) | 36% (10/28) |
| BPs Won% (Total) | 63% (5/8) | 100% (1/1) |
| Return Points W% | 56% (30/54) | 32% (13/41) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 67% (2/3) | 33% (1/3) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/1) |
| Deciding Set Win% | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/1) |
| 1st set W, W | 100% (1/1) | 50% (2/1) |
| 1st set W, L | 0% (1/0) | 50% (2/1) |
| 1st set L, W | 50% (2/1) | 0% (1/0) |
Giorgi VS Vandeweghe H2h Matches played
| Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 6-3 6-1 |
Stats 
Camila Giorgi
Player
Coco Vandeweghe
39%
(
16 of
41)
1st Serve %
48%
(
26 of
54)
4
Aces
7
6
Double Faults
6
88%
(
14 of
16)
1st Serve Won
54%
(
14 of
26)
56%
(
14 of
25)
2nd Serve Won
36%
(
10 of
28)
63%
(
5 of
8)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
32%
(
13 of
41)
Rtn Points Won
56%
(
30 of
54)
58
Total Points Won
37
|
||||
| 4-6 7-6(6) 6-2 | |||||
| 6-4 7-5 | |||||
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| stats | Camila Giorgi | Coco Vandeweghe |
|---|---|---|
| YTD W/L | 33% (3/6) | 0% (0/0) |
| Sets Win/Loss | 38% (8/13) | 0% (0/0) |
| Games Win/Loss | 44% (82/103) | 0% (0/0) |
| Hard Win/Loss | 38% (3/5) | 0% (0/0) |
| Clay Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Indoor Hard W/L | 0% (0/1) | 0% (0/0) |
| Grass Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Aces pg | 0.33 | 0 |
| Aces Total | 30 | 0 |
| DFs per game | 0.67 | 0 |
| DFs Total | 60 | 0 |
| Avg Match Time | 1:41:35 | 1st Match |
| Avg Opp Rank | 124.11 | 0 |
| 1st Serve % | 54% (344/634) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st Serve W% | 67% (232/344) | 0% (0/0) |
| 2nd Serve W% | 42% (123/290) | 0% (0/0) |
| BPs Won% Total | 43% (21/49) | 0% (0/0) |
| Return Pts W% | 38% (212/564) | 0% (0/0) |
| Slam W/L | 0% (0/1) | 0% (0/0) |
| Masters W/L | 50% (2/2) | 0% (0/0) |
| Cups W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Main Tour W/L | 25% (1/3) | 0% (0/0) |
| Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Challenger W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Futures W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 33% (3/9) | 0% (0/0) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Deciding Set W% | 33% (1/3) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, W | 67% (3/2) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, L | 33% (3/1) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set L, W | 17% (6/1) | 0% (0/0) |
Camila Giorgi Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R2 |
Stats
Iga Swiatek
Player
Camila Giorgi
62%
(
26 of
42)
1st Serve %
60%
(
29 of
48)
2
Aces
2
1
Double Faults
9
77%
(
20 of
26)
1st Serve Won
59%
(
17 of
29)
69%
(
11 of
16)
2nd Serve Won
26%
(
5 of
19)
45%
(
5 of
11)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
4)
26%
(
11 of
42)
Rtn Points Won
54%
(
26 of
48)
57
Total Points Won
33
|
6-1 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Camila Giorgi
Player
Magdalena Frech
59%
(
36 of
61)
1st Serve %
60%
(
34 of
57)
4
Aces
1
7
Double Faults
2
83%
(
30 of
36)
1st Serve Won
62%
(
21 of
34)
48%
(
12 of
25)
2nd Serve Won
57%
(
13 of
23)
60%
(
3 of
5)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
3)
31%
(
19 of
61)
Rtn Points Won
40%
(
23 of
57)
65
Total Points Won
53
|
6-4 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Linda Noskova
Player
Camila Giorgi
63%
(
37 of
59)
1st Serve %
53%
(
44 of
83)
4
Aces
6
5
Double Faults
10
76%
(
28 of
37)
1st Serve Won
68%
(
30 of
44)
45%
(
10 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
28%
(
11 of
39)
42%
(
5 of
12)
Break Points Won
29%
(
2 of
7)
36%
(
21 of
59)
Rtn Points Won
51%
(
42 of
83)
80
Total Points Won
62
|
6-3 7-5 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Camila Giorgi
Player
Katie Boulter
48%
(
28 of
58)
1st Serve %
47%
(
22 of
47)
1
Aces
1
7
Double Faults
6
75%
(
21 of
28)
1st Serve Won
64%
(
14 of
22)
57%
(
17 of
30)
2nd Serve Won
36%
(
9 of
25)
100%
(
4 of
4)
Break Points Won
25%
(
1 of
4)
34%
(
20 of
58)
Rtn Points Won
51%
(
24 of
47)
62
Total Points Won
43
|
6-3 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Clara Tauson
Player
Camila Giorgi
59%
(
46 of
78)
1st Serve %
50%
(
38 of
76)
10
Aces
4
5
Double Faults
4
80%
(
37 of
46)
1st Serve Won
76%
(
29 of
38)
50%
(
16 of
32)
2nd Serve Won
47%
(
18 of
38)
57%
(
4 of
7)
Break Points Won
67%
(
2 of
3)
32%
(
25 of
78)
Rtn Points Won
38%
(
29 of
76)
82
Total Points Won
72
|
3-6 6-3 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Victoria Azarenka
Player
Camila Giorgi
53%
(
45 of
85)
1st Serve %
51%
(
49 of
96)
8
Aces
5
7
Double Faults
7
84%
(
38 of
45)
1st Serve Won
65%
(
32 of
49)
40%
(
16 of
40)
2nd Serve Won
40%
(
19 of
47)
42%
(
5 of
12)
Break Points Won
25%
(
2 of
8)
36%
(
31 of
85)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
45 of
96)
99
Total Points Won
82
|
6-1 4-6 6-3 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Claire Liu
Player
Camila Giorgi
72%
(
34 of
47)
1st Serve %
60%
(
28 of
47)
5
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
4
76%
(
26 of
34)
1st Serve Won
57%
(
16 of
28)
46%
(
6 of
13)
2nd Serve Won
37%
(
7 of
19)
63%
(
5 of
8)
Break Points Won
25%
(
1 of
4)
32%
(
15 of
47)
Rtn Points Won
51%
(
24 of
47)
56
Total Points Won
38
|
6-3 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Jelena Ostapenko
Player
Camila Giorgi
57%
(
28 of
49)
1st Serve %
53%
(
32 of
60)
9
Aces
4
4
Double Faults
5
89%
(
25 of
28)
1st Serve Won
53%
(
17 of
32)
43%
(
9 of
21)
2nd Serve Won
43%
(
12 of
28)
44%
(
4 of
9)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
31%
(
15 of
49)
Rtn Points Won
52%
(
31 of
60)
65
Total Points Won
44
|
6-1 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Camila Giorgi
Player
Peyton Stearns
57%
(
60 of
105)
1st Serve %
44%
(
44 of
100)
4
Aces
7
7
Double Faults
10
67%
(
40 of
60)
1st Serve Won
75%
(
33 of
44)
49%
(
22 of
45)
2nd Serve Won
36%
(
20 of
56)
50%
(
6 of
12)
Break Points Won
31%
(
4 of
13)
41%
(
43 of
105)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
47 of
100)
109
Total Points Won
96
|
5-7 6-2 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R3 |
Stats
Maria Sakkari
Player
Camila Giorgi
74%
(
32 of
43)
1st Serve %
54%
(
27 of
50)
4
Aces
0
2
Double Faults
6
72%
(
23 of
32)
1st Serve Won
56%
(
15 of
27)
45%
(
5 of
11)
2nd Serve Won
17%
(
4 of
23)
75%
(
6 of
8)
Break Points Won
50%
(
2 of
4)
35%
(
15 of
43)
Rtn Points Won
62%
(
31 of
50)
59
Total Points Won
34
|
6-2 6-2 | H2H | ||
view more
Coco Vandeweghe Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Q1 |
Stats
Eva Lys
Player
Coco Vandeweghe
67%
(
39 of
58)
1st Serve %
37%
(
19 of
52)
1
Aces
3
3
Double Faults
4
72%
(
28 of
39)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
12 of
19)
47%
(
9 of
19)
2nd Serve Won
30%
(
10 of
33)
50%
(
5 of
10)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
7)
36%
(
21 of
58)
Rtn Points Won
58%
(
30 of
52)
67
Total Points Won
43
|
6-0 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Robin Montgomery
Player
Coco Vandeweghe
53%
(
39 of
73)
1st Serve %
40%
(
25 of
63)
9
Aces
10
9
Double Faults
11
74%
(
29 of
39)
1st Serve Won
72%
(
18 of
25)
47%
(
16 of
34)
2nd Serve Won
45%
(
17 of
38)
67%
(
4 of
6)
Break Points Won
43%
(
3 of
7)
38%
(
28 of
73)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
28 of
63)
73
Total Points Won
63
|
6-3 7-6(3) | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Carol Zhao
Player
Coco Vandeweghe
78%
(
53 of
68)
1st Serve %
53%
(
41 of
78)
11
Aces
9
3
Double Faults
4
87%
(
46 of
53)
1st Serve Won
71%
(
29 of
41)
47%
(
7 of
15)
2nd Serve Won
62%
(
23 of
37)
14%
(
1 of
7)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
22%
(
15 of
68)
Rtn Points Won
33%
(
26 of
78)
79
Total Points Won
67
|
7-6(4) 6-4 | H2H | ||
| Q2 |
Stats
Coco Vandeweghe
Player
Barbora Palicova
57%
(
44 of
77)
1st Serve %
81%
(
50 of
62)
6
Aces
3
8
Double Faults
1
61%
(
27 of
44)
1st Serve Won
60%
(
30 of
50)
61%
(
20 of
33)
2nd Serve Won
42%
(
5 of
12)
67%
(
4 of
6)
Break Points Won
60%
(
3 of
5)
39%
(
30 of
77)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
27 of
62)
74
Total Points Won
65
|
6-4 7-6(0) | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Coco Vandeweghe
Player
Su Jeong Jang
49%
(
42 of
86)
1st Serve %
75%
(
69 of
92)
3
Aces
9
7
Double Faults
3
71%
(
30 of
42)
1st Serve Won
58%
(
40 of
69)
50%
(
22 of
44)
2nd Serve Won
61%
(
14 of
23)
33%
(
4 of
12)
Break Points Won
50%
(
3 of
6)
40%
(
34 of
86)
Rtn Points Won
41%
(
38 of
92)
90
Total Points Won
88
|
6-3 2-6 6-3 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Xinyu Wang
Player
Coco Vandeweghe
61%
(
34 of
56)
1st Serve %
53%
(
30 of
57)
2
Aces
9
4
Double Faults
6
85%
(
29 of
34)
1st Serve Won
73%
(
22 of
30)
45%
(
10 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
48%
(
13 of
27)
75%
(
3 of
4)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
30%
(
17 of
56)
Rtn Points Won
39%
(
22 of
57)
61
Total Points Won
52
|
6-4 6-4 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Coco Vandeweghe
Player
Carol Zhao
55%
(
23 of
42)
1st Serve %
67%
(
32 of
48)
9
Aces
1
5
Double Faults
1
96%
(
22 of
23)
1st Serve Won
50%
(
16 of
32)
58%
(
11 of
19)
2nd Serve Won
56%
(
9 of
16)
44%
(
4 of
9)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
2)
21%
(
9 of
42)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
23 of
48)
56
Total Points Won
34
|
6-3 6-1 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Lena Papadakis
Player
Coco Vandeweghe
76%
(
35 of
46)
1st Serve %
51%
(
22 of
43)
5
Aces
5
4
Double Faults
7
80%
(
28 of
35)
1st Serve Won
64%
(
14 of
22)
45%
(
5 of
11)
2nd Serve Won
38%
(
8 of
21)
100%
(
4 of
4)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
28%
(
13 of
46)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
21 of
43)
54
Total Points Won
35
|
6-3 6-2 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Francesca Jones
Player
Coco Vandeweghe
68%
(
32 of
47)
1st Serve %
56%
(
34 of
61)
1
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
3
66%
(
21 of
32)
1st Serve Won
59%
(
20 of
34)
47%
(
7 of
15)
2nd Serve Won
26%
(
7 of
27)
67%
(
6 of
9)
Break Points Won
100%
(
3 of
3)
40%
(
19 of
47)
Rtn Points Won
56%
(
34 of
61)
62
Total Points Won
46
|
6-3 6-3 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Elvina Kalieva
Player
Coco Vandeweghe
60%
(
29 of
48)
1st Serve %
35%
(
17 of
49)
2
Aces
1
5
Double Faults
6
76%
(
22 of
29)
1st Serve Won
47%
(
8 of
17)
42%
(
8 of
19)
2nd Serve Won
28%
(
9 of
32)
55%
(
6 of
11)
Break Points Won
40%
(
2 of
5)
38%
(
18 of
48)
Rtn Points Won
65%
(
32 of
49)
62
Total Points Won
35
|
6-1 6-2 | H2H | ||
view more
Giorgi Vs Vandeweghe Prediction H2H Images To Share
Today's H2H Tennis Betting Tips & Predictions
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us [email protected]
